Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16141 - 16150 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16141 - 16150 of 30081 for de.
[PDF]
Gregg E. Waterman v. Theresa Roetter
statutory and court order interpretation, both of which are questions of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14155 - 2014-09-15
statutory and court order interpretation, both of which are questions of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14155 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. Id. ¶9 The requirement to disclose under WIS. STAT. § 971.23 includes not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36117 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Id. ¶9 The requirement to disclose under WIS. STAT. § 971.23 includes not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36117 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 328, 528 N.W.2d 85, 87 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7785 - 2017-09-19
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 328, 528 N.W.2d 85, 87 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7785 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Larry G. Edwards
not raise a "new issue" presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. ¶8 Neither party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
not raise a "new issue" presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. ¶8 Neither party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
David Donisi v. Sharon McGann
reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20381 - 2017-09-21
reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20381 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56318 - 2014-09-15
to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56318 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
-04). Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32647 - 2014-09-15
-04). Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32647 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Armour v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679391 - 2023-07-18
). The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Armour v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679391 - 2023-07-18
[PDF]
Marty H. Coopman v. American Family Insurance Company
contracts and the interpretation and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12264 - 2017-09-21
contracts and the interpretation and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” See id. No. 2020AP583-CR 5 ¶13 A defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388506 - 2021-07-13
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” See id. No. 2020AP583-CR 5 ¶13 A defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388506 - 2021-07-13