Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16161 - 16170 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16161 - 16170 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
State v. James R. Boardman
will consider de novo whether the circuit court has erred in the application of law to undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31
will consider de novo whether the circuit court has erred in the application of law to undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie Groenke
. Our review on this issue is de novo because the trial court that decided the new trial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
. Our review on this issue is de novo because the trial court that decided the new trial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
State v. David N. Burkhart
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
Production Stamping Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company
granting summary judgment. See id. ¶9 We review the trial court’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14453 - 2005-03-31
granting summary judgment. See id. ¶9 We review the trial court’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14453 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. Moats, 156 Wis. 2d at 101. ¶5 Postconviction, Laboy argued that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90288 - 2012-12-11
, which we review de novo. Moats, 156 Wis. 2d at 101. ¶5 Postconviction, Laboy argued that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90288 - 2012-12-11
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12594 - 2005-03-31
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12594 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
facts which would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
facts which would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
condemnation statutes to undisputed or found facts, thus presenting questions of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50755 - 2010-06-08
condemnation statutes to undisputed or found facts, thus presenting questions of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50755 - 2010-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
: de novo. See State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶¶30, 78, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 369, 388, 734 N.W.2d 48, 57, 67
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
: de novo. See State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶¶30, 78, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 369, 388, 734 N.W.2d 48, 57, 67
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
WI App 127 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1366-CR Complete Titl...
erroneous. Id., ¶12. Then, we review de novo whether those facts constitute a Fourth Amendment violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69202 - 2011-09-27
erroneous. Id., ¶12. Then, we review de novo whether those facts constitute a Fourth Amendment violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69202 - 2011-09-27