Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16161 - 16170 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16161 - 16170 of 30081 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Justin Kolp
reviews de novo. See State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1997). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3661 - 2017-09-19
reviews de novo. See State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1997). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3661 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consider de novo whether the facts demonstrate a violation of constitutional principles. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226064 - 2018-10-30
consider de novo whether the facts demonstrate a violation of constitutional principles. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226064 - 2018-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brenda B., 331 Wis. 2d 310, ¶¶26-27. A circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76202 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brenda B., 331 Wis. 2d 310, ¶¶26-27. A circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of statutory construction, such as this one, our review is de novo. Stuart v. Weisflog’s Showroom Gallery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88770 - 2014-09-15
of statutory construction, such as this one, our review is de novo. Stuart v. Weisflog’s Showroom Gallery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88770 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a claim for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State ex rel. Treat v. Puckett
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461376 - 2021-12-09
a claim for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State ex rel. Treat v. Puckett
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461376 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which we review de novo. State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 519, 545 N.W.2d 244 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27166 - 2014-09-15
, which we review de novo. State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 519, 545 N.W.2d 244 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27166 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Elizabeth Freer v. Michael A. Whitcomb
this court to decide the issue as a matter of law. We need not decide the matter de novo. ¶13 Implicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20975 - 2017-09-21
this court to decide the issue as a matter of law. We need not decide the matter de novo. ¶13 Implicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20975 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
instruction presents a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Glenn, 199 Wis. 2d 575, 581-82
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372086 - 2021-06-02
instruction presents a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Glenn, 199 Wis. 2d 575, 581-82
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372086 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209899 - 2018-03-15
that we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209899 - 2018-03-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). The PRB’s findings will be upheld
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). The PRB’s findings will be upheld
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21