Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16161 - 16170 of 29740 for des.
Search results 16161 - 16170 of 29740 for des.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Seth P. Hartigan
, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). The referee's conclusions of law, however, are subject to de novo review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20614 - 2011-03-15
, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). The referee's conclusions of law, however, are subject to de novo review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20614 - 2011-03-15
State v. Randall M. Miller
cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2009-11-23
cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2009-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. Moats, 156 Wis. 2d at 101. ¶5 Postconviction, Laboy argued that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90288 - 2012-12-11
, which we review de novo. Moats, 156 Wis. 2d at 101. ¶5 Postconviction, Laboy argued that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90288 - 2012-12-11
2009 WI APP 75
is a constitutionally protected duty of the sheriff is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kocken v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36204 - 2009-05-26
is a constitutionally protected duty of the sheriff is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kocken v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36204 - 2009-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of the $2500 necessary to convict him of a Class C felony. We review de novo whether a court had subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
of the $2500 necessary to convict him of a Class C felony. We review de novo whether a court had subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
State v. Michelle S.
is a legal issue that we review de novo, State v. Thomas J.W., 213 Wis. 2d 264, 268–269, 570 N.W.2d 586, 587
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3318 - 2005-03-31
is a legal issue that we review de novo, State v. Thomas J.W., 213 Wis. 2d 264, 268–269, 570 N.W.2d 586, 587
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3318 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 183
judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004 WI 74, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34520 - 2008-12-16
judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004 WI 74, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34520 - 2008-12-16
Alison M. Welin v. Elizabeth A. Pyrzynski
facts, all questions of law, which we review de novo. Van Erden v. Sobczak, 2004 WI App 40, ¶¶11, 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18589 - 2005-06-15
facts, all questions of law, which we review de novo. Van Erden v. Sobczak, 2004 WI App 40, ¶¶11, 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18589 - 2005-06-15
State v. Michael Bartz
N.W.2d 827, 833 (1973). We conduct our review de novo because the question of whether a lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9572 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 827, 833 (1973). We conduct our review de novo because the question of whether a lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9572 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph A. Weiss
presents a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Rodriguez, 205 Wis.2d 620, 626, 556 N.W.2d 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13402 - 2005-03-31
presents a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Rodriguez, 205 Wis.2d 620, 626, 556 N.W.2d 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13402 - 2005-03-31