Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16161 - 16170 of 68629 for law.
Search results 16161 - 16170 of 68629 for law.
State v. Marshall R. Reese
, with intent to deliver, and battering a law enforcement officer.[1] See Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)1, 940.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
, with intent to deliver, and battering a law enforcement officer.[1] See Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)1, 940.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
: (1) whether the officer had “probable cause to believe” Feldman was violating a drunk driving law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33177 - 2014-09-15
: (1) whether the officer had “probable cause to believe” Feldman was violating a drunk driving law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33177 - 2014-09-15
Sharon Ferries v. Kieth M. Ferries
not do.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1032 (6th ed. 1990). The latter is simply another way of stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11807 - 2005-03-31
not do.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1032 (6th ed. 1990). The latter is simply another way of stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11807 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not provide for “temporary sole legal custody” as an option. It stated that it was unaware of case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039596 - 2025-11-19
not provide for “temporary sole legal custody” as an option. It stated that it was unaware of case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039596 - 2025-11-19
[PDF]
Thomas Feller v. Badger Mutual Insurance Company
is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). ¶8 The construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6722 - 2017-09-20
is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). ¶8 The construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6722 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Vonnie D. Darby v. Jon Litscher
violates any law or any regulation of the jail, or neglects or refuses to perform any duty lawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5160 - 2017-09-19
violates any law or any regulation of the jail, or neglects or refuses to perform any duty lawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5160 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Marshall R. Reese
, No. 2005AP23-CR 2 with intent to deliver, and battering a law enforcement officer. 1 See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20870 - 2017-09-21
, No. 2005AP23-CR 2 with intent to deliver, and battering a law enforcement officer. 1 See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20870 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was no requirement for law enforcement to physically hand the warrant to Williams in order to properly execute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119232 - 2026-05-21
that there was no requirement for law enforcement to physically hand the warrant to Williams in order to properly execute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119232 - 2026-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Erickson, 227 Wis. 2d 758, 768, 596 N.W.2d 749 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52097 - 2010-07-14
is a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Erickson, 227 Wis. 2d 758, 768, 596 N.W.2d 749 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52097 - 2010-07-14
State v. Jon M. Schirmang
found Schirmang had not received the proper warnings under the Implied Consent Law. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11417 - 2005-03-31
found Schirmang had not received the proper warnings under the Implied Consent Law. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11417 - 2005-03-31