Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16161 - 16170 of 20937 for word.

State v. Craig A. Sussek
was, in his words, no more than a “thinly-veiled attempt to increase the statutory maximum for the attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13265 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. In other words, the solicitation of sales of tangible personal property is the “lower limit” activity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963127 - 2025-06-03

COURT OF APPEALS
did is I used a similar extrapolation for the [actuarial test] that I did for age. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106277 - 2014-01-06

State v. Hilary H. Koch, Jr.
). “For a statute to be clear and unambiguous, its words, phrases and sentences must be subject to but one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7870 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daryl M. Knighten
. Occasionally, events during a trial will require the making of a record beyond the spoken word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11401 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Parisi asks us to review on appeal, based on, in Parisi’s own words, whether Metropolitan Place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135621 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mark E. Hoppe v. Town of Porter Board of Adjustment
record—which, in the Hansons’ own words, was “lengthy” and “developed.” The meeting was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13614 - 2017-09-21

Jace C. Schmelzer v. James P. Murphy
satisfied there is arguable merit to such proceedings. The present wording of the relevant portion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17012 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in the same chapter as the applicable rule quoted above. Looking at the wording and elements included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86799 - 2012-09-05

State v. Ludwig Guzman
bias” refers to the prospective juror’s state of mind and is “bias that is revealed through the words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15918 - 2005-03-31