Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16171 - 16180 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Robert W. Sweat
construe § 973.20(14)(b), STATS.4 Statutory construction is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19

Frontsheet
, but conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144546 - 2015-07-14

[PDF] State v. Reginold B. Trussell
and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15732 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jesse Hardy Swinson v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, not that of the circuit court, and our review is de novo. See State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis. 2d 226, 233, 461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4265 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. We review that issue de novo. Id. ¶6 The first step in the analysis is to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18

[PDF] David L. Gilbert v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. § 71.75. Statutory No. 00-2154 4 interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2903 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Willie J. Wroten
we review de novo. Id. No. 00-3385-CR 4 Plea Withdrawal. ¶6 After sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3390 - 2017-09-19

William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 127-28. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89384 - 2012-11-20

Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rosemary Kubokawa
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as those employed by the trial court. See Greene v. General
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14947 - 2005-03-31