Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16171 - 16180 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16171 - 16180 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the record and the court does not weigh the evidence or conduct a de novo review. State ex rel. Conn. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-30
to the record and the court does not weigh the evidence or conduct a de novo review. State ex rel. Conn. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
facts that, if true, entitle the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54126 - 2014-09-15
facts that, if true, entitle the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54126 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph A. Weiss
is sought presents a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Rodriguez, 205 Wis.2d 620, 626, 556 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13402 - 2017-09-21
is sought presents a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Rodriguez, 205 Wis.2d 620, 626, 556 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13402 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Justin Kolp
reviews de novo. See State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1997). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3661 - 2017-09-19
reviews de novo. See State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1997). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3661 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have already concluded that any discrepancy between the two statements was de minimis. See Kennedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15
have already concluded that any discrepancy between the two statements was de minimis. See Kennedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291974 - 2020-09-29
presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291974 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
offenses. Questions of statutory interpretation are questions of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144391 - 2017-09-21
offenses. Questions of statutory interpretation are questions of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144391 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36845 - 2014-09-15
a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36845 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William E. Hall
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2627 - 2017-09-19
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2627 - 2017-09-19