Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16171 - 16180 of 64247 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".

[DOCX] Reinstatement Questionnaire – Administrative
or by any other institution of higher education? If so, identify the institution and describe
/services/attorney/docs/reinstatequest_admin.docx - 2021-03-29

[DOCX] Reinstatement Questionnaire – Readmission Following Resignation
or by any other institution of higher education? If so, identify the institution and describe
/services/attorney/docs/reinstatequest_resign.docx - 2021-03-29

[DOCX] Reinstatement Questionnaire – Inactive to Active
education? If so, identify the institution and describe the circumstances, including relevant dates. 9
/services/attorney/docs/reinstatequest_inactive-active.docx - 2021-03-29

[PDF] APPLICATION FORM
OversightAccess to Justice Commission Employment: Professional Memberships: Other Interests: Education
/courts/committees/docs/committeeinterestform.pdf - 2025-08-04

COURT OF APPEALS
arrest and the search. We affirm the denial of the suppression motion and the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80617 - 2012-04-09

City of Eau Claire v. Kimberly M. Langenfeld
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI). The sole issue on appeal is whether the arresting officer had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3628 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Eau Claire v. Kimberly M. Langenfeld
issue on appeal is whether the arresting officer had reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3628 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Demetri Manto
lacked probable cause to arrest him for resisting an officer. This court disagrees and affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15394 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conduct giving probable cause for Johnson’s arrest and the search. We affirm the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80617 - 2014-09-15

State v. Demetri Manto
probable cause to arrest him for resisting an officer. This court disagrees and affirms. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15394 - 2005-03-31