Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16181 - 16190 of 98406 for court records search online.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of testimony, however. This court has no duty to scour the record to review arguments unaccompanied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294503 - 2020-10-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Nevertheless, we concluded, based on our review of the record, that the court’s “use of a barrier between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517245 - 2022-05-03

[PDF] Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 28, 2005 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19117 - 2017-09-21

Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 28, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 10, 2026 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076240 - 2026-02-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in Stokes’ pole barn. ¶2 The circuit court concluded that the facts in the record established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001260 - 2025-08-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
rely on our review of the record, including the trial court’s analysis of the issues. Claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473979 - 2022-01-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 15, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377519 - 2021-06-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 14, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441044 - 2021-10-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that are not transmitted to a reviewing court via the cold record. Our inability to review demeanor and thus assess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355336 - 2021-04-14