Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16181 - 16190 of 29827 for des.
Search results 16181 - 16190 of 29827 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. The defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31063 - 2013-03-26
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. The defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31063 - 2013-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous, but whether those facts “pass constitutional muster” is a question of law reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147971 - 2015-09-02
clearly erroneous, but whether those facts “pass constitutional muster” is a question of law reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147971 - 2015-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
damages, that issue presents a legal question, which is reviewed de novo. J.K., 337 Wis. 2d 504, ¶32. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111941 - 2014-05-08
damages, that issue presents a legal question, which is reviewed de novo. J.K., 337 Wis. 2d 504, ¶32. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111941 - 2014-05-08
State v. Jose G. Corpus
and that the information was prejudicial. Id., ¶22. A constitutional issue is presented which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-08-16
and that the information was prejudicial. Id., ¶22. A constitutional issue is presented which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-08-16
[PDF]
William N. Ledford v. Nancy Turcotte
was adequate to justify nondisclosure. We consider de novo whether the public interest in nondisclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8181 - 2017-09-19
was adequate to justify nondisclosure. We consider de novo whether the public interest in nondisclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8181 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Patricia A. Leider v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8183 - 2017-09-19
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark Andrew Rea
is subject to our de novo review. In Interest of Michael R. B., 175 Wis.2d 713, 720, 499 N.W.2d 641, 644
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8110 - 2017-09-19
is subject to our de novo review. In Interest of Michael R. B., 175 Wis.2d 713, 720, 499 N.W.2d 641, 644
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8110 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Nuttleman
of law that we review de novo. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d at 356, 525 N.W.2d at 104. Pepper knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13102 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d at 356, 525 N.W.2d at 104. Pepper knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118797 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118797 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15