Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16181 - 16190 of 29827 for des.
Search results 16181 - 16190 of 29827 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07
State v. Dennis G. Valstad
probable cause under a de novo standard of review. County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293, 316, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2006-05-02
probable cause under a de novo standard of review. County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293, 316, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2006-05-02
State v. David W. Janke
and constitutional standards are satisfied are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
and constitutional standards are satisfied are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of historical fact will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79224 - 2012-03-07
findings of historical fact will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79224 - 2012-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
,” as required by Wis. Stat. § 973.20(4m), is a question of statutory construction that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55511 - 2010-10-13
,” as required by Wis. Stat. § 973.20(4m), is a question of statutory construction that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55511 - 2010-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion was sufficiently supported to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a legal issue that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47753 - 2010-03-08
a motion was sufficiently supported to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a legal issue that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47753 - 2010-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
(Ct. App. 1998). Whether a written instrument is ambiguous is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31262 - 2007-12-19
(Ct. App. 1998). Whether a written instrument is ambiguous is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31262 - 2007-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dispute whether the Department acted according to law, a question that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528292 - 2022-06-03
dispute whether the Department acted according to law, a question that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528292 - 2022-06-03
[PDF]
Gregg E. Waterman v. Theresa Roetter
statutory and court order interpretation, both of which are questions of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14155 - 2014-09-15
statutory and court order interpretation, both of which are questions of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14155 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26