Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16191 - 16200 of 34005 for dismissal.
Search results 16191 - 16200 of 34005 for dismissal.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion but later filed a notice for voluntary dismissal; thus, that appeal was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218915 - 2018-09-19
denying his motion but later filed a notice for voluntary dismissal; thus, that appeal was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218915 - 2018-09-19
Judith Moreno v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
in favor of American Family Mutual Insurance Company and dismissing their claim for benefits under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15996 - 2005-03-31
in favor of American Family Mutual Insurance Company and dismissing their claim for benefits under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15996 - 2005-03-31
State v. John A. Lettice
. On Monday, March 7, Burgy moved to dismiss the case against Lettice on grounds of prosecutorial misconduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10249 - 2005-03-31
. On Monday, March 7, Burgy moved to dismiss the case against Lettice on grounds of prosecutorial misconduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10249 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
,” and that the dismissed charges could be considered at sentencing. At sentencing, the State recommended a concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369693 - 2021-05-26
,” and that the dismissed charges could be considered at sentencing. At sentencing, the State recommended a concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369693 - 2021-05-26
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
on January 8, 2001. Prior to the jury trial, the circuit court granted the County’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3921 - 2017-09-20
on January 8, 2001. Prior to the jury trial, the circuit court granted the County’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3921 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the remaining counts were dismissed but read in. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149722 - 2017-09-21
, the remaining counts were dismissed but read in. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149722 - 2017-09-21
B&D Contractors, Inc. v. Arwin Window Systems, Inc.
., appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing its claim against Transcontinental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25250 - 2006-06-27
., appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing its claim against Transcontinental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25250 - 2006-06-27
State v. Sean M. Daley
with the agreement, the State would move to dismiss the charges. On January 13, 2003, the trial court approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2006-01-09
with the agreement, the State would move to dismiss the charges. On January 13, 2003, the trial court approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2006-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of sixteen when she and Otis conceived Davonta. Otis filed a response to that motion and a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33381 - 2008-07-14
of sixteen when she and Otis conceived Davonta. Otis filed a response to that motion and a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33381 - 2008-07-14
State v. James Gruentzel
of a nine-year-old girl. A charge of exposing a child to harmful material was dismissed but read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6934 - 2005-03-31
of a nine-year-old girl. A charge of exposing a child to harmful material was dismissed but read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6934 - 2005-03-31