Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16191 - 16200 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 16191 - 16200 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92545 - 2014-09-15
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92545 - 2014-09-15
State v. Titus Graham
it inaccurately characterized his criminal history. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6688 - 2005-03-31
it inaccurately characterized his criminal history. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6688 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
for filing a response, Rosenkranz has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133284 - 2015-01-20
for filing a response, Rosenkranz has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133284 - 2015-01-20
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113964 - 2014-06-10
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113964 - 2014-06-10
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131566 - 2014-12-16
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131566 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
3 response to the summary judgment motion; without holding any hearing on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1122924 - 2026-05-27
3 response to the summary judgment motion; without holding any hearing on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1122924 - 2026-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214314 - 2018-06-13
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214314 - 2018-06-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
3 response to the summary judgment motion; without holding any hearing on the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1122924 - 2026-05-27
3 response to the summary judgment motion; without holding any hearing on the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1122924 - 2026-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522789 - 2022-05-19
dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522789 - 2022-05-19
[PDF]
State v. Donald F. Greeno
independent review of the record, we conclude that Attorney Frantz's analysis of the issues is correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8810 - 2017-09-19
independent review of the record, we conclude that Attorney Frantz's analysis of the issues is correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8810 - 2017-09-19