Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16191 - 16200 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 16191 - 16200 of 58546 for speedy trial.
State v. James Tanksley
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He raises four arguments relating to his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18618 - 2005-06-20
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He raises four arguments relating to his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18618 - 2005-06-20
[PDF]
Janice Krieman v. Mark A. Goldberg
. SNYDER, P.J. Mark A. Goldberg appeals from a trial court order finding him in contempt for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11799 - 2017-09-21
. SNYDER, P.J. Mark A. Goldberg appeals from a trial court order finding him in contempt for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dorothy Ellen Erickson v. Michael Jerome Erickson
, No. 01-2827, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 27, 2002), provide background regarding the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6193 - 2017-09-19
, No. 01-2827, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 27, 2002), provide background regarding the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6193 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Donald D. Mentzel
. His appellate issues are: (1) whether the trial court erroneously declined to give an entrapment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8159 - 2017-09-19
. His appellate issues are: (1) whether the trial court erroneously declined to give an entrapment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8159 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion without a hearing. 1 ¶2 Micklevitz argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233084 - 2019-01-23
his postconviction motion without a hearing. 1 ¶2 Micklevitz argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233084 - 2019-01-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his claim that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142883 - 2017-09-21
his claim that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142883 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intentional homicide for Blodgett’s murder, among other lesser charges. The trial court3 granted Bartelt’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589084 - 2022-11-16
intentional homicide for Blodgett’s murder, among other lesser charges. The trial court3 granted Bartelt’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589084 - 2022-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 against them in favor of Danielle S. Humski. The trial court held that Appellants were liable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737449 - 2023-12-06
2 against them in favor of Danielle S. Humski. The trial court held that Appellants were liable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737449 - 2023-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. §§ 940.225(2)(a) and 940.19(2) (2013-14). 1 The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184341 - 2017-09-21
. §§ 940.225(2)(a) and 940.19(2) (2013-14). 1 The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184341 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. In that motion, Montgomery contended that his trial and postconviction counsel had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24
for postconviction relief. In that motion, Montgomery contended that his trial and postconviction counsel had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24