Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 6309 for 208.

State v. Linda T. Sobish
, 165 Wis. 2d 200, 208, 477 N.W.2d 642 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶3 The parties agree that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3237 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
be reached in a trial.” State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d 707, 710–711 (1997). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96325 - 2013-05-06

[PDF] West Milwaukee East Development, Inc. v. West Milwaukee Village
. Milwaukee, 60 Wis.2d 99, 109–110, 208 N.W.2d 848, 853–854 (1973). The test put forth by Cobb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11110 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
evidence was not newly discovered pursuant to State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d 707 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32439 - 2008-04-14

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
........................................................................ 18 157 Criminal cases .................................................................. 39 208
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654872 - 2023-05-05

State v. Kimberly A. Tomaras
opinion of this court, its holding is binding on us, and we must apply it here. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5218 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
. 2d 208, 220, 556 N.W.2d 326 (Ct. App. 1996) (citation omitted). The circuit court explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141127 - 2015-05-05

COURT OF APPEALS
and conclusions of law, not those of the circuit court. See UPS v. Lust, 208 Wis. 2d 321, 560 N.W.2d 301 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43890 - 2009-11-23

COURT OF APPEALS
v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 185-190, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997) (the court of appeals is bound by published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116153 - 2014-07-02

[PDF] Daniel J.R. LaCount v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
controls and this court has no authority to overrule that decision. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7111 - 2017-09-20