Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 83350 for case search.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 83350 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Ragsdale
2004 WI App 178 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-2795-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6980 - 2017-09-20
2004 WI App 178 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-2795-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6980 - 2017-09-20
State v. Robert A. Ragsdale
2004 WI App 178 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-2795-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 178 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-2795-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
presented in this case. The supreme court upheld a search warrant for the home of a suspected drug dealer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27505 - 2014-09-15
presented in this case. The supreme court upheld a search warrant for the home of a suspected drug dealer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27505 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jerome A. Engl
). Engl contends that the search of his pants pockets following a traffic stop violated his Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14603 - 2017-09-21
). Engl contends that the search of his pants pockets following a traffic stop violated his Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14603 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a warrantless search of his home. Because we conclude that the search was reasonable under the community
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198822 - 2017-10-26
a warrantless search of his home. Because we conclude that the search was reasonable under the community
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198822 - 2017-10-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to search the defendant’s vehicle because “no assertion [was] made in this case that [the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676439 - 2023-07-07
to search the defendant’s vehicle because “no assertion [was] made in this case that [the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676439 - 2023-07-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence based on a challenge to the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781850 - 2024-03-28
erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence based on a challenge to the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781850 - 2024-03-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in a particular case.’” Id., ¶22 (quoted source omitted). In the context of a traffic stop, “such a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
in a particular case.’” Id., ¶22 (quoted source omitted). In the context of a traffic stop, “such a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a warrantless search of his vehicle.2 ¶2 We disagree and, therefore, affirm. BACKGROUND ¶3 On June 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247727 - 2019-10-01
a warrantless search of his vehicle.2 ¶2 We disagree and, therefore, affirm. BACKGROUND ¶3 On June 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247727 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
Harris recently, but it was not a search or seizure suppression case. See State v. Ferguson, 2009 WI 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62022 - 2014-09-15
Harris recently, but it was not a search or seizure suppression case. See State v. Ferguson, 2009 WI 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62022 - 2014-09-15