Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 30072 for de.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 30072 for de.
Date: December 11, 2006 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 3 Opinions for Release On Dec...
. Michelle R. Popenhagen Oneida 2006AP001533 City of Eau Claire v. Kenneth R. Van De Hei Eau Claire
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27415 - 2010-05-18
. Michelle R. Popenhagen Oneida 2006AP001533 City of Eau Claire v. Kenneth R. Van De Hei Eau Claire
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27415 - 2010-05-18
Date: January 18, 2008 To: Clerk of Court of Appeals From: District 2 Opinions for Release On Janu...
. Michael T. Sheedy Milwaukee 2007AP000045 Nelly De La Trinidad v. Capitol Indemnity Corporation Kenosha
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31608 - 2008-01-17
. Michael T. Sheedy Milwaukee 2007AP000045 Nelly De La Trinidad v. Capitol Indemnity Corporation Kenosha
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31608 - 2008-01-17
Supreme Court of Wisconsin No. 14-06 In the Matter of the Petition to Amend Supre...
more discretion in cases of de minimus violations. IT IS ORDERED that a public hearing on the petition
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144214 - 2015-07-06
more discretion in cases of de minimus violations. IT IS ORDERED that a public hearing on the petition
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144214 - 2015-07-06
Robert W. Probst v. Peter Chen
, Suite 700 Madison, WI 53703 Hon. John A. Des Jardins Outagamie County Courthouse 320 S. Walnut Street
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6852 - 2005-03-31
, Suite 700 Madison, WI 53703 Hon. John A. Des Jardins Outagamie County Courthouse 320 S. Walnut Street
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6852 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, we review de novo.[4] When reviewing an agency’s interpretation of a statute, however, we may apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51342 - 2010-06-23
, we review de novo.[4] When reviewing an agency’s interpretation of a statute, however, we may apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51342 - 2010-06-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
) to undisputed facts. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that, as a general rule, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51342 - 2014-09-15
) to undisputed facts. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that, as a general rule, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51342 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by appellate courts. Strenke, 279 Wis. 2d 52, ¶13 (providing for a de novo standard of review under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291031 - 2022-10-31
by appellate courts. Strenke, 279 Wis. 2d 52, ¶13 (providing for a de novo standard of review under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291031 - 2022-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. See Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50990 - 2010-06-15
grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. See Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50990 - 2010-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the potential applicability of Graham and Miller to Williams. This presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105359 - 2013-12-09
the potential applicability of Graham and Miller to Williams. This presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105359 - 2013-12-09
Gianni Bozzacchi v. Thomas S. O'Malley
of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11941 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11941 - 2005-03-31