Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 69870 for his.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 69870 for his.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 HRUZ, J.1 Vladimir Kozubovsky, pro se, appeals an order dismissing his claims against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780113 - 2024-03-26
. ¶1 HRUZ, J.1 Vladimir Kozubovsky, pro se, appeals an order dismissing his claims against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780113 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
State v. John S. Provo
are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. No. 03-1710 2 order denying his motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6624 - 2017-09-19
are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. No. 03-1710 2 order denying his motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6624 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the court erroneously instructed the jury at his trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135551 - 2015-02-23
the court erroneously instructed the jury at his trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135551 - 2015-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
by denying his pretrial motion to suppress statements. We reject Zarm’s arguments and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28785 - 2007-04-23
by denying his pretrial motion to suppress statements. We reject Zarm’s arguments and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28785 - 2007-04-23
State v. John S. Provo
. § 948.07(3) (2001-02)[1] and a postconviction order denying his motion for plea withdrawal and a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31
. § 948.07(3) (2001-02)[1] and a postconviction order denying his motion for plea withdrawal and a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues the court erroneously instructed the jury at his trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135551 - 2017-09-21
argues the court erroneously instructed the jury at his trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135551 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
; and the denial of his postconviction request for a Machner hearing.[1] West argues that he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48364 - 2010-03-29
; and the denial of his postconviction request for a Machner hearing.[1] West argues that he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48364 - 2010-03-29
State v. Ismet D. Divanovic
relief. On appeal, Divanovic contends that: (1) he was denied his constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8843 - 2005-03-31
relief. On appeal, Divanovic contends that: (1) he was denied his constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8843 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Tucker
erred when it denied his motion to suppress two statements that he gave to the police because, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4730 - 2017-09-19
erred when it denied his motion to suppress two statements that he gave to the police because, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4730 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
offense. He argues the evidence presented at his court trial was insufficient to support a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167987 - 2017-09-21
offense. He argues the evidence presented at his court trial was insufficient to support a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167987 - 2017-09-21