Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 70149 for his.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 70149 for his.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not pay Tlapa any additional compensation beyond his standard salary for the use of his name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708650 - 2023-09-28
not pay Tlapa any additional compensation beyond his standard salary for the use of his name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708650 - 2023-09-28
State v. David Arredondo
-degree intentional homicide and second-degree sexual assault, and from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5626 - 2005-03-31
-degree intentional homicide and second-degree sexual assault, and from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5626 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from two orders denying his motions for postconviction relief and his judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374319 - 2021-06-08
appeals from two orders denying his motions for postconviction relief and his judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374319 - 2021-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 HRUZ, J.1 Vladimir Kozubovsky, pro se, appeals an order dismissing his claims against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780113 - 2024-03-26
. ¶1 HRUZ, J.1 Vladimir Kozubovsky, pro se, appeals an order dismissing his claims against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780113 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
Ed Mordell v. Peter Blumka
in January 2000 at the age of 80. His first will, signed in 1980, left his estate to his wife, Valerie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3458 - 2017-09-20
in January 2000 at the age of 80. His first will, signed in 1980, left his estate to his wife, Valerie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3458 - 2017-09-20
State v. Robert E. Tucker
)(a) and 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Blankenship was convicted on his no-contest pleas to one count of aggravated battery and three counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064654 - 2026-01-23
, Blankenship was convicted on his no-contest pleas to one count of aggravated battery and three counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064654 - 2026-01-23
State v. John S. Provo
. § 948.07(3) (2001-02)[1] and a postconviction order denying his motion for plea withdrawal and a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31
. § 948.07(3) (2001-02)[1] and a postconviction order denying his motion for plea withdrawal and a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit court denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948761 - 2025-04-29
, pro se, appeals from an order of the circuit court denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023-24)1 motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948761 - 2025-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
the court erroneously instructed the jury at his trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135551 - 2015-02-23
the court erroneously instructed the jury at his trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135551 - 2015-02-23