Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 77621 for search which.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 77621 for search which.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified to at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102150 - 2017-09-21
warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified to at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102150 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to an unlawful warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2013-09-24
to an unlawful warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2013-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of male genitalia and a picture of himself. Trudelle described the sexual activity in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465863 - 2021-12-21
of male genitalia and a picture of himself. Trudelle described the sexual activity in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465863 - 2021-12-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was an unlawful search and that any derivative evidence should be suppressed. The State agrees that the GPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98391 - 2014-09-15
was an unlawful search and that any derivative evidence should be suppressed. The State agrees that the GPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98391 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a pat-down search and found $342 in Richardson’s back right pocket. Freidel looked through the money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141601 - 2015-05-12
a pat-down search and found $342 in Richardson’s back right pocket. Freidel looked through the money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141601 - 2015-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which Freidel considered to be incriminating evidence. ¶21 Even when the sole object of a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141601 - 2017-09-21
, which Freidel considered to be incriminating evidence. ¶21 Even when the sole object of a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141601 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Borst
whether, based on the findings of the search, which included photographs of children, he now wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19310 - 2017-09-21
whether, based on the findings of the search, which included photographs of children, he now wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19310 - 2017-09-21
State v. David Borst
, based on the findings of the search, which included photographs of children, he now wanted to speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19310 - 2005-08-16
, based on the findings of the search, which included photographs of children, he now wanted to speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19310 - 2005-08-16
[PDF]
State v. Shirlene Davis
), which established a blanket rule permitting the no-knock execution of search warrants in all felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16037 - 2017-09-21
), which established a blanket rule permitting the no-knock execution of search warrants in all felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16037 - 2017-09-21
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
by failing to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search and that the convictions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31
by failing to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search and that the convictions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31