Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 1621 - 1630 of 58285 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
for an appropriate sentence. ¶4 The trial court conducted a plea colloquy with Horne, accepted his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109920 - 2014-04-07
for an appropriate sentence. ¶4 The trial court conducted a plea colloquy with Horne, accepted his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109920 - 2014-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence. ¶4 The trial court conducted a plea colloquy with Horne, accepted his pleas, and found him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109920 - 2017-09-21
sentence. ¶4 The trial court conducted a plea colloquy with Horne, accepted his pleas, and found him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109920 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Kons
was presented, that audio tapes were improperly admitted into evidence and that the trial court interfered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8127 - 2017-09-19
was presented, that audio tapes were improperly admitted into evidence and that the trial court interfered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8127 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David L. Kons
was presented, that audio tapes were improperly admitted into evidence and that the trial court interfered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7960 - 2017-09-19
was presented, that audio tapes were improperly admitted into evidence and that the trial court interfered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7960 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Warren A. Goodman
relief. He asks this court to review whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10198 - 2017-09-20
relief. He asks this court to review whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10198 - 2017-09-20
State v. Warren A. Goodman
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He asks this court to review whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He asks this court to review whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel and that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7995 - 2017-09-19
that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel and that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7995 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel and that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7994 - 2017-09-19
that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel and that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7994 - 2017-09-19