Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16201 - 16210 of 30191 for de.
Search results 16201 - 16210 of 30191 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that this court decides de novo. Ibid. First, the defendant must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95505 - 2013-04-15
a question of law that this court decides de novo. Ibid. First, the defendant must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95505 - 2013-04-15
Thyra K. v. Community Care Organization of Milwaukee County, Inc.
are recoverable, is a question of law that is subject to our de novo review. Elliott v. Donahue, 169 Wis.2d 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11691 - 2014-08-05
are recoverable, is a question of law that is subject to our de novo review. Elliott v. Donahue, 169 Wis.2d 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11691 - 2014-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“Interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
) (“Interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
Regal Ware, Inc. v. TSCO Corporation
jurisdiction is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Brown v. LaChance, 165 Wis.2d 52, 65, 477
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10049 - 2005-03-31
jurisdiction is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Brown v. LaChance, 165 Wis.2d 52, 65, 477
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10049 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶8 In order to modify a maintenance award, the moving party must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78373 - 2012-02-21
review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶8 In order to modify a maintenance award, the moving party must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78373 - 2012-02-21
Rodney Rowsey v. Kenneth Morgan
we review de novo. Id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12614 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12614 - 2005-03-31
State v. John A. Mahoney
review de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 715, 616 N.W.2d 126, 132-33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3009 - 2015-03-11
review de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 715, 616 N.W.2d 126, 132-33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3009 - 2015-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional standards, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. ¶13 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68451 - 2011-07-26
constitutional standards, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. ¶13 To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68451 - 2011-07-26
Joe Tynan v. JBVBB, LLC
. We review the granting of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6088 - 2005-03-31
. We review the granting of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6088 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether those facts are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. Id. The reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32259 - 2010-11-01
review de novo whether those facts are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. Id. The reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32259 - 2010-11-01