Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16201 - 16210 of 30081 for de.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to support the jury’s guilty verdicts for three crimes. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350844 - 2021-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. Id. at 127-28. ¶7 Whether a plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89384 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, as we do any written instrument. See Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App 40, ¶6, 300 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110388 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Todd D. Duerst
). Both of these inquiries present questions of law, which an appellate court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7467 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 17
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wilke v. City of Appleton, 197 Wis. 2d 717, 726, 541 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34744 - 2014-09-15

Wisconsin Court System - Court services for attorneys - Redaction
of state employment records if the employee demands de novo review of the release (Woznicki notice) [Wis
/services/attorney/redact/guide.htm - 2026-03-01

State v. Demetrius N.O.
which this court reviews de novo. See Brandt v. LIRC, 160 Wis.2d 353, 361, 466 N.W.2d 673, 676 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11908 - 2005-03-31

Micah Oriedo v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
of a statute may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4059 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference, or we may review de novo, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115918 - 2005-03-31

Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc. v. Jerome B. Mueller
. A. Summary judgment. Our standard of review for summary judgment questions is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9105 - 2005-03-31