Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16201 - 16210 of 30191 for de.
Search results 16201 - 16210 of 30191 for de.
State v. Marquis D. Rosenburg
review de novo without deference to the decisions of the lower courts. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis. 2d 75
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2005-03-31
review de novo without deference to the decisions of the lower courts. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis. 2d 75
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Woodard, 2012 WI App 43, ¶6, 340 Wis. 2d 548, 812 N.W.2d 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125234 - 2014-10-28
de novo. See Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Woodard, 2012 WI App 43, ¶6, 340 Wis. 2d 548, 812 N.W.2d 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125234 - 2014-10-28
William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law[,] which we review de novo.” Id. (quoting Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108174 - 2014-02-18
is a question of law[,] which we review de novo.” Id. (quoting Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108174 - 2014-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of historical fact will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79224 - 2012-12-25
findings of historical fact will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79224 - 2012-12-25
COURT OF APPEALS
,” as required by Wis. Stat. § 973.20(4m), is a question of statutory construction that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55511 - 2010-10-13
,” as required by Wis. Stat. § 973.20(4m), is a question of statutory construction that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55511 - 2010-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. Wis. Const. art 1, § 7. We review de novo whether a defendant’s constitutional confrontation rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34813 - 2008-12-08
. Wis. Const. art 1, § 7. We review de novo whether a defendant’s constitutional confrontation rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34813 - 2008-12-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55130 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55130 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Reginold B. Trussell
and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15732 - 2017-09-21
and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15732 - 2017-09-21