Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16201 - 16210 of 73361 for we.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that he is entitled to plea withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502558 - 2022-04-06

[PDF] Marilyn C. Goetsch v. Howard N. Goetsch
of changed circumstances. We reject his arguments and affirm the order. Howard based his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13180 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098693 - 2026-04-02

COURT OF APPEALS
of Parker’s inculpatory statement. We affirm. ¶2 Parker was convicted of several felonies after trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30702 - 2007-10-24

State of Wisconsin ex. rel. Efrain Sanchez, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
to find him guilty; and (5) that the return to the writ was not timely and properly filed. We reject each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19709 - 2005-09-21

[PDF] County of Jefferson v. Michael V. Hendricks
Hendricks had no right to counsel in a prosecution for violating a traffic regulation, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2178 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, counsel’s report, and J.L.S.’s response, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185365 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and the No. 2017AP653-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213874 - 2018-06-04

[PDF] NOTICE
exercised its discretion by not granting his motion to reopen. We agree and therefore reverse.2 ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27870 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
an equalizing payment of $15,900 to his former wife, Tina Jakircevic. Because we conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28033 - 2007-02-06