Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16211 - 16220 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16211 - 16220 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Mary A. Klovers v. City of Beaver Dam
of a significant difference between certiorari review and a claim that is litigated de novo in circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3640 - 2017-09-19
of a significant difference between certiorari review and a claim that is litigated de novo in circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3640 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256126 - 2020-03-10
a conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256126 - 2020-03-10
[PDF]
Kelli T-G. v. Gerald A. Charland
danger. Our review of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8654 - 2017-09-19
danger. Our review of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8654 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Pierre A. LaForte v. Timothy W. Bandoli
We review the trial court's decision de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2583 - 2017-09-19
We review the trial court's decision de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2583 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
weight deference, due weight deference, or we may review No. 2013AP2056 4 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115918 - 2017-09-21
weight deference, due weight deference, or we may review No. 2013AP2056 4 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115918 - 2017-09-21
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willie J. Wroten
the defective performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. Plea Withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3390 - 2005-03-31
the defective performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. Plea Withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3390 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48500 - 2014-08-04
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48500 - 2014-08-04