Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16211 - 16220 of 29821 for des.
Search results 16211 - 16220 of 29821 for des.
State v. Brook Grzelak
. This case requires us to interpret § 976.05(3)(a), Stats., which we do de novo. See Kettner v. Wausau Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
. This case requires us to interpret § 976.05(3)(a), Stats., which we do de novo. See Kettner v. Wausau Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
accept the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
accept the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court found that Jaeger’s initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2011-11-01
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court found that Jaeger’s initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2011-11-01
State v. Justin Kolp
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3661 - 2005-03-31
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3661 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to order restitution under a particular set of facts is an issue of law we review de novo. State v. Haase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
to order restitution under a particular set of facts is an issue of law we review de novo. State v. Haase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. N.J.W. v. State, 168 Wis. 2d 646, 652, 485 N.W.2d 70 (Ct. App. 1992). “The findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030511 - 2025-10-29
review de novo. N.J.W. v. State, 168 Wis. 2d 646, 652, 485 N.W.2d 70 (Ct. App. 1992). “The findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030511 - 2025-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2012AP236-CR 2012AP237-CR ...
that we review de novo.” See id. If Brown’s motion raises such facts, then the trial court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89425 - 2015-06-29
that we review de novo.” See id. If Brown’s motion raises such facts, then the trial court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89425 - 2015-06-29
State v. Ricardo Martinez
right to a fair trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 The threshold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7401 - 2005-03-31
right to a fair trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 The threshold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7401 - 2005-03-31
Kevin J. Kollock v. City of Cumberland Zoning Board of Appeals
, it is ambiguous. Id. Whether an ordinance is ambiguous is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7446 - 2005-03-31
, it is ambiguous. Id. Whether an ordinance is ambiguous is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7446 - 2005-03-31