Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16211 - 16220 of 17097 for probate/1000.

State v. Chad D. Schroeder
, and courts of probate. The legislature may also vest such jurisdiction as shall be deemed necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14039 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jesus Barbary
: three years probation for each count, concurrent, with various conditions. Barbary argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31

Paige K.B. v. Louis J. Molepske
immunity to a GAL performing such functions. ¶20 In Jaeger, the court considered whether, in a probate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17154 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
written by a probation and parole agent from the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) and one written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65172 - 2011-06-19

State v. Angel Luis Rodriguez
Rodriguez had not pressed charges against Guyette, Rodriguez replied, “Because he’s on probation, and I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3143 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ralph E. Adams
to a two-year stayed prison term and the trial court placed him on probation for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12710 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 105
or violates a term of bond or probation. This statute, too, is inapplicable for three reasons. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36809 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
, was engaged to be married and cooperated with the probation agent. As we stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
, was engaged to be married and cooperated with the probation agent. As we stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 105
a court order or violates a term of bond or probation. This statute, too, is inapplicable for three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36809 - 2009-07-28