Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16211 - 16220 of 58595 for speedy trial.
Search results 16211 - 16220 of 58595 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 against them in favor of Danielle S. Humski. The trial court held that Appellants were liable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737449 - 2023-12-06
2 against them in favor of Danielle S. Humski. The trial court held that Appellants were liable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737449 - 2023-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. In that motion, Montgomery contended that his trial and postconviction counsel had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24
for postconviction relief. In that motion, Montgomery contended that his trial and postconviction counsel had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24
State v. Michael M. Longcore
that the arresting officer lacked probable cause to stop his vehicle and that the trial court therefore erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2553 - 2005-03-31
that the arresting officer lacked probable cause to stop his vehicle and that the trial court therefore erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2553 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel and postconviction counsel were ineffective for failing to challenge the admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
trial counsel and postconviction counsel were ineffective for failing to challenge the admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
State v. Vlado Gazic
trial. We affirm the judgment. We first address Gazic’s claim that the charges were multiplicitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11392 - 2005-03-31
trial. We affirm the judgment. We first address Gazic’s claim that the charges were multiplicitous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BRASH, C.J.1 Chloe appeals the orders of the trial court terminating her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592618 - 2022-11-22
, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BRASH, C.J.1 Chloe appeals the orders of the trial court terminating her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592618 - 2022-11-22
State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
that the trial court had not erred in accepting Elizondo’s waiver of counsel, but that Elizondo had alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court had not erred in accepting Elizondo’s waiver of counsel, but that Elizondo had alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
Donna K. Bracken v. Daniel M. Derse
, 1992, but the trial court struck the jury's answers in the verdict on the issue of negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10430 - 2005-03-31
, 1992, but the trial court struck the jury's answers in the verdict on the issue of negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10430 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Stephen E. Lee appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a bench trial at which he was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644637 - 2023-04-21
Stephen E. Lee appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a bench trial at which he was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644637 - 2023-04-21
[PDF]
State v. Vlado Gazic
are multiplicitous by failing to raise that claim before the conclusion of his trial. We affirm the judgment. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11392 - 2017-09-19
are multiplicitous by failing to raise that claim before the conclusion of his trial. We affirm the judgment. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11392 - 2017-09-19