Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16221 - 16230 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 16221 - 16230 of 84312 for case number.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774911 - 2024-03-13
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774911 - 2024-03-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102846 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102846 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115651 - 2014-07-01
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115651 - 2014-07-01
State v. James L. Kirk
pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02).[1] Kirk raises a number of issues regarding the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02).[1] Kirk raises a number of issues regarding the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Andrew L. Hunsick
2001 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 01-1212-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16505 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 01-1212-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16505 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the case at length and was “satisfied [J.J.] [wa]sn’t going to get any undue advantage by listening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151842 - 2017-09-21
the case at length and was “satisfied [J.J.] [wa]sn’t going to get any undue advantage by listening
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151842 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774911 - 2024-03-13
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774911 - 2024-03-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
that his probation in this case had been previously revoked. When Murphy began debating the point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60273 - 2014-09-15
that his probation in this case had been previously revoked. When Murphy began debating the point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60273 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. The judge attempted to contact Angela by calling a cell phone number provided by her father, and left
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2015-03-23
. The judge attempted to contact Angela by calling a cell phone number provided by her father, and left
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138273 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the Commission’s decision was arbitrary because it prejudged his case. This issue is moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234526 - 2019-02-12
argues that the Commission’s decision was arbitrary because it prejudged his case. This issue is moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234526 - 2019-02-12