Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16221 - 16230 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16221 - 16230 of 29823 for des.
State v. Dale Iversen
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14540 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14540 - 2005-03-31
State v. Trevor A. McKee
hearing procedures were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11975 - 2005-03-31
hearing procedures were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11975 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
at 838. Whether the facts constitute a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Ibid. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82322 - 2012-05-14
at 838. Whether the facts constitute a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Ibid. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82322 - 2012-05-14
Robert Perry v. Foremost Farms USA Cooperative
of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15772 - 2013-10-30
of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15772 - 2013-10-30
State v. Kerry A. Jordan
passes statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16136 - 2005-03-31
passes statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16136 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demetrius N.O.
which this court reviews de novo. See Brandt v. LIRC, 160 Wis.2d 353, 361, 466 N.W.2d 673, 676 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11908 - 2005-03-31
which this court reviews de novo. See Brandt v. LIRC, 160 Wis.2d 353, 361, 466 N.W.2d 673, 676 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11908 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law which we review de novo. Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis. 2d 420, 427, 456 N.W.2d 653 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72331 - 2011-10-18
of law which we review de novo. Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis. 2d 420, 427, 456 N.W.2d 653 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72331 - 2011-10-18
Alison M. Welin v. Elizabeth A. Pyrzynski
facts, all questions of law, which we review de novo. Van Erden v. Sobczak, 2004 WI App 40, ¶¶11, 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18589 - 2005-06-15
facts, all questions of law, which we review de novo. Van Erden v. Sobczak, 2004 WI App 40, ¶¶11, 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18589 - 2005-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
qualifies as a “premises” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61 is a question of statutory construction we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79419 - 2012-03-13
qualifies as a “premises” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61 is a question of statutory construction we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79419 - 2012-03-13
Village of Cross Plains v. Kristin J. Haanstad
. Thus, this issue presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Carlson, 2002 WI App 44, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18129 - 2005-05-11
. Thus, this issue presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Carlson, 2002 WI App 44, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18129 - 2005-05-11