Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16231 - 16240 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16231 - 16240 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
State v. Ronald C. Foust
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Healthcare Servs. Grp., Inc. v. DOR, 2018 WI App 48, ¶10, 383 Wis. 2d 699, 916 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932371 - 2025-03-25
review de novo. Healthcare Servs. Grp., Inc. v. DOR, 2018 WI App 48, ¶10, 383 Wis. 2d 699, 916 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932371 - 2025-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“Interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
) (“Interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law, reviewable de novo.”). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
State v. John F. Draves
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10858 - 2005-03-31
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10858 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of contract or a lien were questions of law subject to de novo review. Only the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102089 - 2017-09-21
of contract or a lien were questions of law subject to de novo review. Only the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102089 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or correctly. The construction of a settlement agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306738 - 2020-11-24
or correctly. The construction of a settlement agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306738 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a new factor exists is a question of law for our de novo review. See id., ¶¶33, 36. Whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245270 - 2019-08-14
a new factor exists is a question of law for our de novo review. See id., ¶¶33, 36. Whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245270 - 2019-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently determining whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91034 - 2012-12-26
without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently determining whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91034 - 2012-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, but apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Tews v. NHI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92824 - 2013-02-11
a grant of summary judgment de novo, but apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Tews v. NHI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92824 - 2013-02-11
State v. David N. Burkhart
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2008-02-20
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2008-02-20