Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16231 - 16240 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16231 - 16240 of 30081 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Kemmick D. Holmes
of punishment.” No. 99-1535-CR 4 has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15633 - 2017-09-21
of punishment.” No. 99-1535-CR 4 has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15633 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
applies is one of law, which we review de novo.2 DeFever v. City of Waukesha, 2007 WI App 266, ¶6
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257448 - 2020-04-15
applies is one of law, which we review de novo.2 DeFever v. City of Waukesha, 2007 WI App 266, ¶6
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257448 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. See id. “We review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233552 - 2019-01-29
erroneous. See id. “We review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233552 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which [appellate courts] review de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250461 - 2019-11-21
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which [appellate courts] review de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250461 - 2019-11-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the record and the court does not weigh the evidence or conduct a de novo review. State ex rel. Conn. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-30
to the record and the court does not weigh the evidence or conduct a de novo review. State ex rel. Conn. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168401 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56318 - 2014-09-15
to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56318 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to which we apply de novo review.” Saunders, 255 Wis. 2d 589, ¶15 (italics added). ¶10 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191025 - 2017-09-21
to which we apply de novo review.” Saunders, 255 Wis. 2d 589, ¶15 (italics added). ¶10 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dale Iversen
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14229 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14229 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law which this court reviews de novo.” Id., ¶12. Vagueness ¶7 We turn first to McGrath’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256702 - 2020-03-17
of law which this court reviews de novo.” Id., ¶12. Vagueness ¶7 We turn first to McGrath’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256702 - 2020-03-17