Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16241 - 16250 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16241 - 16250 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Kemmick D. Holmes
of punishment.” No. 99-1535-CR 4 has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15633 - 2017-09-21
of punishment.” No. 99-1535-CR 4 has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15633 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pending this appeal. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Village of Slinger v. Polk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456151 - 2021-11-24
pending this appeal. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Village of Slinger v. Polk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456151 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
State v. Brian K. John
. This is a constitutional question we decide de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701, 715, 345 N.W.2d 457, 465 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15151 - 2017-09-21
. This is a constitutional question we decide de novo. See State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701, 715, 345 N.W.2d 457, 465 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15151 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. McGill, 2000 WI 38, ¶17, 234 Wis. 2d 560, 609 N.W.2d 795. We review de novo, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162985 - 2017-09-21
. State v. McGill, 2000 WI 38, ¶17, 234 Wis. 2d 560, 609 N.W.2d 795. We review de novo, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162985 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
). No. 2008AP1956 7 review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. Renz, 231
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37033 - 2014-09-15
). No. 2008AP1956 7 review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. Renz, 231
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37033 - 2014-09-15
State v. Owen Andrew Kreinus
(1983). ¶13 Whether a “new factor” exists is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17754 - 2005-04-18
(1983). ¶13 Whether a “new factor” exists is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17754 - 2005-04-18
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Duerst
). Both of these inquiries present questions of law, which an appellate court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7467 - 2017-09-20
). Both of these inquiries present questions of law, which an appellate court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7467 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Mortgage Lenders Network v. Sandra J. Wangert-Fitzgerald
OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7273 - 2017-09-20
OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7273 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Francesca Poulin v. Indian Community School
determination on the issue of frivolousness, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15211 - 2017-09-21
determination on the issue of frivolousness, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15211 - 2017-09-21