Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16251 - 16260 of 25742 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 16251 - 16260 of 25742 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Lamont Williams
. Whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence rests within the trial court’s discretion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7146 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence rests within the trial court’s discretion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7146 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 971.26 (“No indictment, information, complaint or warrant shall be invalid, nor shall the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30672 - 2007-10-22
. Stat. § 971.26 (“No indictment, information, complaint or warrant shall be invalid, nor shall the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30672 - 2007-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
“NATHANS [sic] INSTALL & Pictures.” Kehoe provided the CD to officer Randall Jensen, and a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35701 - 2009-03-02
“NATHANS [sic] INSTALL & Pictures.” Kehoe provided the CD to officer Randall Jensen, and a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35701 - 2009-03-02
State v. Marvin C. Seay
after reasonable inquiry, the … paper is well-grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3432 - 2005-03-31
after reasonable inquiry, the … paper is well-grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3432 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the claimed error was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. Id. The law prefers less drastic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51299 - 2010-06-29
the claimed error was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. Id. The law prefers less drastic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51299 - 2010-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had active arrest warrants through the Department of Corrections. Consequently, the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18
had active arrest warrants through the Department of Corrections. Consequently, the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” and therefore warranted the issuance of the harassment injunction. The injunction was issued for two years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471216 - 2022-01-11
,” and therefore warranted the issuance of the harassment injunction. The injunction was issued for two years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471216 - 2022-01-11
[PDF]
Conrad L. Aichele and Amanda L. Aichele v. Clark County
to the facts set forth in the affidavits to determine whether summary judgment is warranted on the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15973 - 2017-09-21
to the facts set forth in the affidavits to determine whether summary judgment is warranted on the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15973 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contends that reversal is warranted because “the circuit court failed to make the finding required by WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
contends that reversal is warranted because “the circuit court failed to make the finding required by WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contends that reversal is warranted because “the circuit court failed to make the finding required by WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16
contends that reversal is warranted because “the circuit court failed to make the finding required by WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021970 - 2025-10-16