Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16251 - 16260 of 61999 for child support.

State v. Rachel W. Kelty
to the child’s head, and another with regard to an instrument that would have cut the child’s head. So you’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7045 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Rachel W. Kelty
with a blunt object to the child’s head, and another with regard to an instrument that would have cut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7045 - 2017-09-20

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
to collect child support arrearages, while the present matter involves the same two parties and the same
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=381&year=2012

[MS WORD] JD-1718: Statement of Income, Assets, Debts and Living Expenses
) Child support and/or maintenance from prior spouse Manutención infantil y/o mantenimiento recibido de
/formdisplay/JD-1718_es.doc?formNumber=JD-1718&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2023-02-24

State v. James E. Miller
conclude the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict against him; we further conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7485 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James E. Miller
) was not unconstitutionally broad and vague. We conclude the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7485 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Barry D. Faber
a violation of § 948.055, STATS., which prohibits intentionally causing a child under the age of eighteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14181 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of one count of child enticement. He argues that the evidence was insufficient. We affirm the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64889 - 2014-09-15

Office of State Public Defender v. Circuit Court For Walworth County
with providing counsel in proceedings where a child is alleged in need of protective services (CHIPS), requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15794 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
not want the child to participate in the activity does not lose his or her placement rights. STANDARD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57153 - 2010-11-30