Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16261 - 16270 of 29823 for des.

Vera Hutson v. State of Wisconsin Personnel Commission
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo, and as such, we are not bound by an agency's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16561 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Muriel K. v. Milwaukee County
thereafter his mother and father, Jeanne and Norris Knight [address deleted] began to assume de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7488 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI App 4
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Corey J.G., 215 Wis. 2d 395, 405, 572 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745779 - 2024-02-26

[PDF] Frontsheet
. . . ."). ¶26 Regarding Hineman's request for an in camera review of therapy records, we review such claims de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608990 - 2023-02-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
courts review the first factor de novo, although any factual findings relevant to this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062401 - 2026-01-13

2006 WI APP 224
the interpretation of statutes and their application to a set of facts, both questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26933 - 2006-11-20

[PDF] Stephen M. Kailin v. Perry J. Armstrong
. DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3904 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
courts review the first factor de novo, although any factual findings relevant to this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062400 - 2026-01-13

[PDF] Frontsheet
judgment against Polk de novo. CED Props., LLC v. City of Oshkosh, 2018 WI 24, ¶17, 380 Wis. 2d 399
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352437 - 2021-04-01

[PDF] Robert Hoskins v. Dodge County
, granting defense motions for summary judgment. We conclude on de novo review that the defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3773 - 2017-09-19