Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16271 - 16280 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16271 - 16280 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the [circuit] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208808 - 2018-02-21
the [circuit] court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208808 - 2018-02-21
State v. Marquis D. Rosenburg
review de novo without deference to the decisions of the lower courts. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis. 2d 75
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2012-05-15
review de novo without deference to the decisions of the lower courts. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis. 2d 75
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2012-05-15
Valgene E. Loertscher v. The Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company
. Uniroyal now appeals the order. We review summary judgments de novo, in accordance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11761 - 2013-03-10
. Uniroyal now appeals the order. We review summary judgments de novo, in accordance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11761 - 2013-03-10
State v. David M. Womble
.,[6] or other mandatory duties is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31
.,[6] or other mandatory duties is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony H.
, which we review de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494 (1994). ANALYSIS ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15295 - 2005-03-31
, which we review de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494 (1994). ANALYSIS ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15295 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a). ¶8 At the County’s request, on December 4, 2009, the circuit court held a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54754 - 2010-09-22
)(a). ¶8 At the County’s request, on December 4, 2009, the circuit court held a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54754 - 2010-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
unless clearly erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6890 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6890 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444397 - 2021-10-21
the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444397 - 2021-10-21
[PDF]
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
border, citizens have a diminished expectation of privacy. See United States v. Montoya de Hernandez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18072 - 2017-09-21
border, citizens have a diminished expectation of privacy. See United States v. Montoya de Hernandez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18072 - 2017-09-21