Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16271 - 16280 of 83433 for simple case search.

[PDF] State v. Joseph M. Espinoza
2002 WI App 51 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1473-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4029 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
initials. 3 Our appellate record indicates that Lauren filed a postdisposition motion in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=809564 - 2024-06-04

[PDF] John P. Pappas v. Angeline Pappas Petros
by the public for a period in excess of 100 years. ¶4 The court decided the case after an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4861 - 2017-09-19

John P. Pappas v. Angeline Pappas Petros
The court decided the case after an evidentiary hearing. The circuit court found that the properties owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4861 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph M. Espinoza
2002 WI App 51 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1473-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4029 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ryan Joseph Pierce v. Kimberly Jean Pierce
as a reviewing court is to search the record for reasons to sustain the trial court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5779 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Buffy B. Brown v. Michael J. Grosch
, 223 N.W.2d 567 (1974). Under the clearly erroneous standard of review, we are to search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18030 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
alleged here by Heritage. The court has been unable, despite diligently searching, to find any cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198026 - 2017-10-18

State v. Ervin J. Seidl
. The facts in this case are similar to the facts found in Bobbitt, 178 Wis.2d at 11, 503 N.W.2d at 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14654 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient to undermine the confidence in the outcome” of the case. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209372 - 2018-03-06