Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16281 - 16290 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16281 - 16290 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Sisk
an investigative stop presents a No. 00-2614-CR 4 question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3075 - 2017-09-19
an investigative stop presents a No. 00-2614-CR 4 question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3075 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as de minimus. These issues were addressed by Rynders in an affidavit submitted to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126143 - 2017-09-21
as de minimus. These issues were addressed by Rynders in an affidavit submitted to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126143 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ricardo Miramontes-Santos
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5108 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5108 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ronald Berry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21
of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court found that Jaeger’s initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73001 - 2014-09-15
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court found that Jaeger’s initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73001 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Markus Meinhardt
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
Robert B. Corris v. Barton Peck
In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7425 - 2005-03-31
In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7425 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
intrusion was “de minimis” because “[t]he driver is being asked to expose to view very little more of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108799 - 2014-03-10
intrusion was “de minimis” because “[t]he driver is being asked to expose to view very little more of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108799 - 2014-03-10
State v. Randall M. Miller
cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31
cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80630 - 2012-04-09
findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80630 - 2012-04-09