Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16281 - 16290 of 29739 for des.

[PDF] State v. Robert A. Mendoza
is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12303 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional principles to those facts. Such a review presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220428 - 2018-10-04

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Mettler v. Nellis, 2005 WI App 73, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101465 - 2013-08-28

State v. Parrish C. Payne
reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. If a motion alleging ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12467 - 2005-03-31

Miguel Gallego v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
¶7 We review de novo the circuit court’s dismissal of Gallego’s complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20002 - 2005-12-11

[PDF] Frontsheet
trust account to be used as a de facto bank for his financially compromised son
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131919 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] South Milwaukee Savings Bank v. John Barrett
which we review de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. See Erdman v. Jovoco, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13440 - 2017-09-21

2007 WI APP 209
to interpret the applicable statutes as applied to the amended complaint. We interpret statutes de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29960 - 2007-09-25

[PDF] WI APP 89
of law that we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137–138, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63762 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 48
of law. ¶22 Our review of the circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, but we use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94269 - 2017-09-21