Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 17421 for Cost.

The Warehouse II, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
633, ¶48. ¶18 Wisconsin Stat. § 32.28(3)(b) states in relevant part: In lieu of costs under ch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25418 - 2006-06-05

[PDF] The Warehouse II, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
: In lieu of costs under ch. 814, litigation expenses shall be awarded to the condemnee if: . . . . (b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25418 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 19-09 supporting memo
all or a portion of the costs of a disciplinary proceeding in which misconduct is found, a medical
/supreme/docs/1909memo.pdf - 2019-03-15

[PDF] Lori Butteris v. Stan Christiansen
., and limited the amount of certain costs. The issues on appeal are whether the guests established a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13990 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dunn County v. Peggy R.
noted that a change to a community placement “may be appropriate; however the cost would exceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7311 - 2017-09-20

2007 WI 10
recommended that Attorney Ermert pay the costs of this proceeding, which are $2635.38 as of October 13, 2006
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27896 - 2007-01-22

Frontsheet
damages to a vehicle and a roadway, along with attorney fees and costs. ¶5 D.C. retained Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35382 - 2009-01-28

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joan M. Boyd
to practice law, and that it require Attorney Boyd to pay restitution and costs in connection
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24677 - 2017-09-21

Donald J. Harman v.
, the court granted the motion to dismiss and entered judgment for the defendants with prejudice and costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17255 - 2005-03-31

Timothy J. Marquardt v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
requires expert testimony as to the existence of permanent injuries requiring future treatment and the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18822 - 2005-07-05