Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 45230 for Cost-effective.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 45230 for Cost-effective.
Frontsheet
suspension and the imposition of costs. The referee found that Attorney Winkel committed all of the five
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144075 - 2015-07-06
suspension and the imposition of costs. The referee found that Attorney Winkel committed all of the five
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144075 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
Peggy Allison Broadhead v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
for the sum, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs.… If the offer of settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12289 - 2017-09-21
for the sum, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs.… If the offer of settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12289 - 2017-09-21
Peggy Allison Broadhead v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
for the sum, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs.… If the offer of settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12289 - 2005-03-31
for the sum, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs.… If the offer of settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12289 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 11
for the sum, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs. If the plaintiff accepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57828 - 2014-09-15
for the sum, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs. If the plaintiff accepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57828 - 2014-09-15
2011 WI APP 11
for the sum, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs. If the plaintiff accepts the offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57828 - 2011-01-30
for the sum, or property, or to the effect therein specified, with costs. If the plaintiff accepts the offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57828 - 2011-01-30
[PDF]
WI 40
N.W.2d 311, on the ground that the court based its decision on a statute not in effect when
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28634 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 311, on the ground that the court based its decision on a statute not in effect when
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28634 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for attorney’s fees and costs associated with her petition for judicial review No. 2015AP2661 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183144 - 2017-09-21
for attorney’s fees and costs associated with her petition for judicial review No. 2015AP2661 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183144 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and costs incurred in connection with his office’s representation of Dyer in the Countrywide litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197316 - 2017-10-04
and costs incurred in connection with his office’s representation of Dyer in the Countrywide litigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197316 - 2017-10-04
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
as “price cap regulation.” Ameritech elected this option on September 1, 1994—the statute’s effective date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5929 - 2005-03-31
as “price cap regulation.” Ameritech elected this option on September 1, 1994—the statute’s effective date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5929 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
.” Ameritech elected this option on September 1, 1994—the statute’s effective date—and, by doing so, accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5929 - 2017-09-19
.” Ameritech elected this option on September 1, 1994—the statute’s effective date—and, by doing so, accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5929 - 2017-09-19