Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 29796 for des.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 29796 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion as a question of law subject to de novo review; we limit our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93609 - 2013-03-06
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion as a question of law subject to de novo review; we limit our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93609 - 2013-03-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
the traffic stop. The court denied the motion and Matuszek was convicted. ¶3 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27979 - 2014-09-15
the traffic stop. The court denied the motion and Matuszek was convicted. ¶3 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
have resulted in “something less than a de facto life sentence.” Third, Wilkes argues that we must
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204999 - 2017-12-13
have resulted in “something less than a de facto life sentence.” Third, Wilkes argues that we must
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204999 - 2017-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Phoenix Contractors, Inc. v. Affiliated Cap. Corp., 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811516 - 2024-06-12
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Phoenix Contractors, Inc. v. Affiliated Cap. Corp., 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811516 - 2024-06-12
CA Blank Order
in contempt, and Hallam moved for a hearing de novo. In March 2014, the circuit court held a hearing de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142521 - 2015-05-25
in contempt, and Hallam moved for a hearing de novo. In March 2014, the circuit court held a hearing de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142521 - 2015-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. Id., ¶9. We are not persuaded that Burnette has shown that the circuit court relied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209259 - 2018-03-07
review de novo. Id., ¶9. We are not persuaded that Burnette has shown that the circuit court relied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209259 - 2018-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The State had substantial evidence supporting the crimes to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237642 - 2019-03-20
that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The State had substantial evidence supporting the crimes to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237642 - 2019-03-20
State v. Thomas V.C.
, however, is a question of law the appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Behnke, 203 Wis. 2d 43, 62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2557 - 2005-03-31
, however, is a question of law the appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Behnke, 203 Wis. 2d 43, 62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2557 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the potential applicability of Graham and Miller to Williams. This presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105359 - 2013-12-09
the potential applicability of Graham and Miller to Williams. This presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105359 - 2013-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is procedurally barred is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189686 - 2017-09-21
is procedurally barred is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189686 - 2017-09-21