Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 6666 for mix.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. ¶4 The question of whether counsel’s actions constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89675 - 2014-09-15

State v. Danny L. Peterson
is a mixed standard of review. First, we determine whether the motion on its face alleges sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20676 - 2005-12-19

State v. Jacques Gibson
(1984). ¶7 Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present mixed questions of law and fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
is a mixed question of law and fact. Id., ¶21. We will uphold factual findings, including those related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45696 - 2010-01-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the ineffectiveness inquiry are mixed questions of law and fact.’ Thus, we will not reverse the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114894 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
The denial of an ineffective assistance claim presents a mixed question of fact and law on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29033 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dale L. Larson v. Cincinnati Casualty Company
this interval at Indianhead, he consumed approximately eight beers and five mixed drinks. After his fall, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10110 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Sharon M. Haigh
of an ineffective assistance claim as a mixed question of fact and law. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13682 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and convincing evidence is a mixed question of law and fact. Langlade County v. D.J.W., 2020 WI 41, ¶¶23-24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927060 - 2025-03-19

Natalie Baker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Reasonable cause is a question of mixed law and fact. Ray Hutson Chevrolet, Inc. v. LIRC, 186 Wis.2d 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11929 - 2005-03-31