Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 4454 for neg.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 4454 for neg.
COURT OF APPEALS
), and tested negative for the presence of blood. The report then stated that “[n]o information was obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56775 - 2010-11-15
), and tested negative for the presence of blood. The report then stated that “[n]o information was obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56775 - 2010-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony to somehow negatively impact her appeal. It did not result in any reduction in sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138975 - 2015-04-07
testimony to somehow negatively impact her appeal. It did not result in any reduction in sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138975 - 2015-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the psychological evaluation “negatively impact his ability to parent.” She admitted, however, that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77920 - 2014-09-15
to the psychological evaluation “negatively impact his ability to parent.” She admitted, however, that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77920 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that [Helen was] aware of.” Helen responded in the negative, stating further that “as far as [Joan] ever
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958308 - 2025-05-21
that [Helen was] aware of.” Helen responded in the negative, stating further that “as far as [Joan] ever
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958308 - 2025-05-21
State v. Dion W. Demmerly
was prejudiced by the evidence because it negatively affected his credibility. Specifically, Demmerly points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11054 - 2005-03-31
was prejudiced by the evidence because it negatively affected his credibility. Specifically, Demmerly points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11054 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
about Price’s increased risk of her victimization and re-offense due to the negative impact of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206015 - 2017-12-27
about Price’s increased risk of her victimization and re-offense due to the negative impact of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206015 - 2017-12-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to negative influences and outside pressures[.]” See Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S. Ct. 2011, 2026
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101681 - 2017-09-21
to negative influences and outside pressures[.]” See Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S. Ct. 2011, 2026
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101681 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the law, the defendant was not entitled to a new trial. Id. at 29. We explained that the negative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36610 - 2014-09-15
of the law, the defendant was not entitled to a new trial. Id. at 29. We explained that the negative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36610 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a prejudicial effect on Smith if the jury had a negative view of public representation. ¶2 In his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244704 - 2019-08-06
a prejudicial effect on Smith if the jury had a negative view of public representation. ¶2 In his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244704 - 2019-08-06
[PDF]
State v. William E. Hall
not understand or that needed explaining. Hall responded negatively. ¶16 The transcript thus indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2627 - 2017-09-19
not understand or that needed explaining. Hall responded negatively. ¶16 The transcript thus indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2627 - 2017-09-19