Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Michael Cruz
). Because the ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim Cruz raised in his § 974.06 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7821 - 2017-09-19
). Because the ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim Cruz raised in his § 974.06 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7821 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael Cruz
, 185 Wis.2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Because the ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim Cruz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7821 - 2005-03-31
, 185 Wis.2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Because the ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim Cruz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7821 - 2005-03-31
State v. Romell Quin
appeals the trial court’s order granting Romell Quin’s[1] motion for mistrial based on certain comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13962 - 2005-03-31
appeals the trial court’s order granting Romell Quin’s[1] motion for mistrial based on certain comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13962 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Romell Quin
. No. 98-1252-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. The State of Wisconsin appeals the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13962 - 2014-09-15
. No. 98-1252-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. The State of Wisconsin appeals the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13962 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Milwaukee County appeal from an order of the trial court granting a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780614 - 2024-03-26
, and Milwaukee County appeal from an order of the trial court granting a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780614 - 2024-03-26
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
(1)(b), 940.31(1)(b) and 943.20(1)(a) & (3)(d)(2), Stats. He also appeals from a trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10113 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b), 940.31(1)(b) and 943.20(1)(a) & (3)(d)(2), Stats. He also appeals from a trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10113 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nathaniel Whaley
(1)(b), 940.31(1)(b) and 943.20(1)(a) & (3)(d)(2), Stats. He also appeals from a trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10114 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b), 940.31(1)(b) and 943.20(1)(a) & (3)(d)(2), Stats. He also appeals from a trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10114 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.[2] Lowe argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance at sentencing when he asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95179 - 2005-03-31
.[2] Lowe argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance at sentencing when he asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95179 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sexual assault and one count of false imprisonment. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51299 - 2010-06-29
sexual assault and one count of false imprisonment. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51299 - 2010-06-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51299 - 2014-09-15
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51299 - 2014-09-15