Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1631 - 1640 of 20855 for word.

State v. Dennis R. Thiel
the meaning of the word “may” as used in Wis. Stat. § 980.07(1). The mere presence of the word “may” does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2156 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI APP 29
court to do so. Under this doctrine, “when a general word or phrase follows a list of specifics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27771 - 2007-02-27

2011 WI APP 56
633, 681 N.W.2d 110. If the meaning of the words in the statute is plain and unambiguous, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61120 - 2011-04-19

[PDF] WI APP 56
., 2004 WI 58, ¶45, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110. If the meaning of the words in the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61120 - 2014-09-15

Local 236 Laborers International Union of North America v. City of Madison
. As the union suggests, one potential construction of the phrase is that the word “duties” and the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4047 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
intent is expressed in the words it used. Id. “Statutory language is given its common, ordinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207787 - 2018-02-01

Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that “directly contravenes the words of the statute, is clearly contrary to legislative intent, or is otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13047 - 2005-03-31

wi app 78 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP3166-CR Complete Title...
argument to the contrary. By using the disjunctive word “or” in § 340.01(9r) to separate the various ways
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64184 - 2011-06-28

[PDF] WI APP 29
of ejusdem generis and convinced the circuit court to do so. Under this doctrine, “when a general word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27771 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Richard Vultaggio v. Caryl Yasko
, that is, whether the words complained of are “reasonably capable of conveying a defamatory meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2290 - 2017-09-19