Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16311 - 16320 of 28850 for W.
Search results 16311 - 16320 of 28850 for W.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a four-time offender under WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(g)1. ¶6 “We review de novo ‘[w]hether a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831490 - 2024-07-31
as a four-time offender under WIS. STAT. § 346.65(2)(g)1. ¶6 “We review de novo ‘[w]hether a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831490 - 2024-07-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM W. BRASH, III, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58975 - 2014-09-15
court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM W. BRASH, III, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Kessler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58975 - 2014-09-15
Rodney Olson v. Joshua A. Berg
in part: [W]hen allowed costs shall be as follows: .… (4) Interest on verdict. [I]f the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3015 - 2005-03-31
in part: [W]hen allowed costs shall be as follows: .… (4) Interest on verdict. [I]f the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3015 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John H. Maclin
orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEAN W. DI MOTTO, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19379 - 2017-09-21
orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEAN W. DI MOTTO, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19379 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 113
of Eileen W. Pray and Shunette T. Campbell, assistant attorneys general, and Peggy A. Lautenschlager
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28262 - 2007-04-26
of Eileen W. Pray and Shunette T. Campbell, assistant attorneys general, and Peggy A. Lautenschlager
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28262 - 2007-04-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
544, 787 N.W.2d 350. There is, however, a limitation, because “[w]e need finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23
544, 787 N.W.2d 350. There is, however, a limitation, because “[w]e need finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
undermines confidence in the verdict. “[W]hen a court finds numerous deficiencies in a counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1118475 - 2026-05-20
undermines confidence in the verdict. “[W]hen a court finds numerous deficiencies in a counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1118475 - 2026-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Notice John W. Kellis Electronic Notice Mark A. Schoenfeldt Electronic Notice You
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28
Notice John W. Kellis Electronic Notice Mark A. Schoenfeldt Electronic Notice You
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JERRY W. EHRETT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129364 - 2017-09-21
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JERRY W. EHRETT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129364 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Marion Kay Smith v. Robert Joseph Smith
that this figure varies from the statement of her gross income on her W-2 form, it was the court’s responsibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5614 - 2017-09-19
that this figure varies from the statement of her gross income on her W-2 form, it was the court’s responsibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5614 - 2017-09-19