Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16311 - 16320 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16311 - 16320 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
the judgment to Milwaukee County Circuit Court, requesting a trial de novo before a six-person jury. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27591 - 2006-12-26
the judgment to Milwaukee County Circuit Court, requesting a trial de novo before a six-person jury. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27591 - 2006-12-26
N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
), Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
), Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that person’s consent. We decide the issue of whether the convictions are multiplicitous de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32211 - 2008-03-25
that person’s consent. We decide the issue of whether the convictions are multiplicitous de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32211 - 2008-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Woodard, 2012 WI App 43, ¶6, 340 Wis. 2d 548, 812 N.W.2d 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125234 - 2014-10-28
de novo. See Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Woodard, 2012 WI App 43, ¶6, 340 Wis. 2d 548, 812 N.W.2d 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125234 - 2014-10-28
COURT OF APPEALS
bears the burden of proving prejudice, and we “‘review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57070 - 2009-02-23
bears the burden of proving prejudice, and we “‘review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57070 - 2009-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether a fact is a new factor warranting resentencing is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
). Whether a fact is a new factor warranting resentencing is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
probable cause exists, given a set of undisputed facts, is a question of law we review de novo. Washburn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133579 - 2015-01-27
probable cause exists, given a set of undisputed facts, is a question of law we review de novo. Washburn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133579 - 2015-01-27
CA Blank Order
. This is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Id. If “the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2011-05-02
. This is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Id. If “the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2011-05-02
State v. Miguel Rocha-Castro
facts, are sufficient to fulfill the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5109 - 2005-03-31
facts, are sufficient to fulfill the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5109 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
,’ and the application of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
,’ and the application of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28