Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16311 - 16320 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16311 - 16320 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
State v. Willie J. Wroten
the defective performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. Plea Withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3390 - 2005-03-31
the defective performance was prejudicial are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. Plea Withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3390 - 2005-03-31
Housing Partnership Corporation v. Ms. Renee Miller
intervention under the statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 549, 334 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12190 - 2005-03-31
intervention under the statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 549, 334 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12190 - 2005-03-31
James Reese v. City of Pewaukee
we review de novo. Tobler v. Door County, 158 Wis. 2d 19, 21, 461 N.W.2d 775 (1990). ¶5 B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3780 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Tobler v. Door County, 158 Wis. 2d 19, 21, 461 N.W.2d 775 (1990). ¶5 B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3780 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
duties is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶21. ¶10 The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29782 - 2007-07-23
duties is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶21. ¶10 The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29782 - 2007-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 22, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of action for abuse of process is a question of law to be decided de novo by the appellate court. Id., ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27146 - 2006-11-21
of action for abuse of process is a question of law to be decided de novo by the appellate court. Id., ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27146 - 2006-11-21
State v. David W. Janke
and constitutional standards are satisfied are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
and constitutional standards are satisfied are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 183
judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004 WI 74, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34520 - 2008-12-16
judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004 WI 74, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34520 - 2008-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44707 - 2009-12-16
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44707 - 2009-12-16
Frontsheet
de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55827 - 2008-10-19
de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55827 - 2008-10-19
Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
decision, we need not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10245 - 2005-03-31
decision, we need not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10245 - 2005-03-31