Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16321 - 16330 of 30191 for de.
Search results 16321 - 16330 of 30191 for de.
Timothy J. Gross v. Gail M. Gross
de novo. Id. at 846‑47, 454 N.W.2d at 58. Under Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(21), a “serial family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Id. at 846‑47, 454 N.W.2d at 58. Under Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(21), a “serial family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2013-12-04
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2013-12-04
COURT OF APPEALS
there was ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100715 - 2013-08-12
there was ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100715 - 2013-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶8 In order to modify a maintenance award, the moving party must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78373 - 2015-03-10
review de novo. Id. Discussion ¶8 In order to modify a maintenance award, the moving party must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78373 - 2015-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently determining whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91034 - 2012-12-26
without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently determining whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91034 - 2012-12-26
State v. Jose G. Corpus
and that the information was prejudicial. Id., ¶22. A constitutional issue is presented which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-04-16
and that the information was prejudicial. Id., ¶22. A constitutional issue is presented which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-04-16
10AP1092 State v. John J. Neff
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56318 - 2010-11-09
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56318 - 2010-11-09
[PDF]
WI App 37
The circuit court, on de novo review of court commissioner rulings, granted CreditBox’s motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670926 - 2023-08-08
The circuit court, on de novo review of court commissioner rulings, granted CreditBox’s motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670926 - 2023-08-08
1325 North Van Buren, LLC v. T-3 Group, Ltd.
, the court is presented solely with a question of law, subject to de novo review." Id. (citing Winkelman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25860 - 2006-07-10
, the court is presented solely with a question of law, subject to de novo review." Id. (citing Winkelman
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25860 - 2006-07-10
Frontsheet
.[14] III. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶37 "[T]he constitutional issue of punitive damages merits de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110652 - 2014-04-21
.[14] III. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶37 "[T]he constitutional issue of punitive damages merits de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110652 - 2014-04-21