Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16331 - 16340 of 17453 for ex.

[PDF] WI APP 64
to the policy choices of the legislature. See State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 58
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143972 - 2017-09-21

2006 WI APP 249
” that justify relief. State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H., 122 Wis. 2d 536, 549, 363 N.W.2d 419 (1985). ¶33 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27294 - 2006-12-19

2006 WI APP 193
or specially defined words are given their technical or special definitions. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26287 - 2006-09-26

[PDF] State v. Andrew D.W.
declines to address them. See State ex rel. WED v. Joint Comm., 73 Wis.2d 234, 236, 243 N.W.2d 497, 498
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15598 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
interpretation is to discern the intent of the legislature. See State ex rel. Jacobus v. State, 208 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17085 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
been recognized by No. 96-0164 21 this state. 10 Respondent's Brief at 9. See State ex rel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17086 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 73
means so that it may be given its full, proper, and intended effect.” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300183 - 2020-12-08

COURT OF APPEALS
with Wisconsin’s long held views as to the value of private property. In State ex rel. Bollenbeck v. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51336 - 2010-06-23

Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
the intent of the legislature. See State ex rel. Jacobus v. State, 208 Wis. 2d 39, 47-48, 559 N.W.2d 900
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17085 - 2005-03-31

Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
recognized by this state.[10] Respondent's Brief at 9. See State ex rel. Carter v. Harper, 182 Wis. 148
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17086 - 2005-03-31