Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16331 - 16340 of 50107 for our.
Search results 16331 - 16340 of 50107 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with deference, limiting our analysis to whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168024 - 2017-09-21
with deference, limiting our analysis to whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168024 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
seeking to withdraw his guilty pleas in these consolidated matters. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877016 - 2024-11-19
seeking to withdraw his guilty pleas in these consolidated matters. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877016 - 2024-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. ¶17 Our ensuing discussion in Gregory L.S. focused on the question of what is the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33347 - 2008-07-09
. Id. ¶17 Our ensuing discussion in Gregory L.S. focused on the question of what is the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33347 - 2008-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Mikulance
. In our December 2004 summary order, we wrote, “Mikulance raises almost countless points; he breaks his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21764 - 2017-09-21
. In our December 2004 summary order, we wrote, “Mikulance raises almost countless points; he breaks his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21764 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 11
. We accept for our analysis (with reluctance) the parties’ stipulation that Alvarez’s undocumented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131960 - 2017-09-21
. We accept for our analysis (with reluctance) the parties’ stipulation that Alvarez’s undocumented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131960 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258477 - 2020-04-28
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258477 - 2020-04-28
[PDF]
Quality State Oil Company, Inc. v. Michael VanDaalwyk
, 560 N.W.2d 315 (Ct. App. 1997). When we interpret and apply statutes, our aim is to discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6988 - 2017-09-20
, 560 N.W.2d 315 (Ct. App. 1997). When we interpret and apply statutes, our aim is to discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6988 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Robert B. Ciarpaglini v. Kelly Flury
on § 814.025(1) and (3)(b), STATS. However, our conclusion on the § 814.025, STATS., issue does not end our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10722 - 2017-09-20
on § 814.025(1) and (3)(b), STATS. However, our conclusion on the § 814.025, STATS., issue does not end our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10722 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reversal[.]” Id. at 7. II. We exercise our authority to ignore forfeiture and address the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235525 - 2019-03-01
reversal[.]” Id. at 7. II. We exercise our authority to ignore forfeiture and address the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235525 - 2019-03-01
[PDF]
State v. Wilbert L. Thomas
request. ¶3 On December 8, 1999, the supreme court affirmed our decision. See State v. Thomas, 231
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2160 - 2017-09-19
request. ¶3 On December 8, 1999, the supreme court affirmed our decision. See State v. Thomas, 231
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2160 - 2017-09-19